By Jueseppi B.
By Associated Press, Published: March 19
“WASHINGTON — An assault weapons ban won’t be in the gun-control legislation that Democrats bring to the Senate floor next month, a decision that means the ban’s chances of survival now are all but hopeless.
The ban is the most controversial firearms restriction that President Barack Obama and other Democrats have pressed for since an assault-type weapon was used in the December massacre at an elementary school in Newtown, Conn. Rejection by Congress would be a major victory for the National Rifle Association and its supporters and a setback for Obama and the provision’s sponsor, California Sen. Dianne Feinstein.
In a tactical decision, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., concluded that including the prohibition in the gun bill would jeopardize the chances for passage of any firearms legislation at all, taking away votes that would be needed to overcome Republican attempts to block the Senate from even taking up the issue.
“I very much regret it,” Feinstein said Tuesday of the choice that Reid told her he had made. “I tried my best. But my best, I guess, wasn’t good enough.”
Feinstein’s proposal to prohibit military-style weapons will still get a vote as an amendment to the gun legislation that Democrats debate. But she is all but certain to need 60 votes from the 100-member Senate to prevail, and she faces solid Republican opposition as well as likely defections from some Democrats.”
Democratic Senators Have No Spine:
Maybe they thought with President Barack Hussein Obama out of the country, visiting Israel, The West Bank AND Jordan, it would be easier to bow down to the NRAssholes and their big money lobbyist.
This is the nightmare scenario:
“Reid guts Senate gun control bill.”1
“Tuesday’s developments are a major win for the powerful National Rifle Association.”2
“[Assault weapons] ban’s chances of survival now are all but hopeless.”3
“[A]nother major element of the president’s gun policy proposal could be joining the assault weapons ban in the scrap heap.”4
After months of promises that, in the wake of Newtown, this time would be different, congressional Democrats, led by Majority Leader Harry Reid, are on the verge of caving on the three most critical gun violence prevention proposals: universal background checks, a ban on assault weapons, and a ban on high-capacity magazines.
What’s looking most likely to end up in the final bill? A provision encouraging guns in schools.
No, no, no. MoveOn members and our allies have done so much to make real reform possible—with tens of thousands of phone calls, events, lobby visits, letters, and pleas from victims’ families.
We’ve come too far to let meaningful gun violence prevention measures be killed by the NRA’s backroom lobbying, Republicans’ perpetual threats of filibustering, and Democrats who won’t stand up and fight.
From The Hill’s Blog Briefing Room | @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook
Reid guts Senate gun control bill
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has decided the federal assault weapons ban will not be a part of the base bill, and warned Tuesday an expansion of background checks to cover private sales might not make the cut either.
Instead, a bipartisan measure cracking down on straw purchasing and illegal trafficking of firearms will serve as the foundation of firearms legislation.
That is a significant blow to Obama, who recently touted that the Senate Judiciary Committee had advanced “three of the most important elements of my proposal to help reduce the epidemic of gun violence in this country.”
Obama’s three pillars have been reduced to one, with the bill facing an uncertain future in the GOP-led House.
Tuesday’s developments are a major win for the powerful National Rifle Association (NRA), which launched a massive lobbying effort soon after a Connecticut gunman killed 27 people, including 20 children, last December. Obama later called that day the worst of his presidency.
Reid said the assault weapons ban sponsored by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), which faces staunch opposition from the gun rights group, could have sunk the entire legislative effort.
“Right now, her amendment, using the most optimistic numbers, has less than 40 votes. That’s not 60. I have to get something on the floor so we can have votes on that issue and the other issues that I’ve talked about. That’s what I’m going to try to do,” Reid told reporters Tuesday. Reid has previously opposed the assault weapons ban.
The majority leader indicated legislation crafted by Sen. Charles Schumer — and passed by the Judiciary Committee — to require background checks for private sales might not make it in the package unless the New York Democrat can find more Republican support.
Schumer had been negotiating a bipartisan deal with Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), but those talks stalled earlier this month. Schumer earlier this year called background checks the “sweet spot” of gun control legislation.
“All these issues are important, and I’m going to do what I can to make sure we have a fair, sound debate on this. But we can’t have it unless I have something that I can put on the floor to proceed to it,” Reid said. “And I’m not going to try to put something on the floor that won’t succeed.”
Reid needs at least five Republican votes to begin a floor debate on gun legislation, and hopes to bring the bill to the Senate floor next month after the upcoming two-week recess.
Reid could bypass a filibuster on proceeding to gun legislation if he guarantees Republicans vote on two amendments of their choice, a reform the Senate enacted earlier this year to speed up floor action.
A spokesman for Schumer said the background-check legislation passed by the Judiciary Committee is a placeholder. Schumer and Sens. Mark Kirk (Ill.), a centrist Republican, and Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), who has an A rating from the NRA, are shopping to Republicans a proposal that would expand background checks to cover all gun sales. Kirk has an F rating from the NRA.
To entice Republican support, Schumer has agreed to a provision that would let rural gun sellers conduct background checks from home computers and would give military veterans an avenue to appeal findings by the Department of Veterans Affairs that they are mentally unfit to own a firearm, a Senate aide said.
The Schumer-Coburn talks fell apart over the thorny question of how to enforce background checks for private sales. Schumer says records must be kept of these checks to ensure they took place. But Coburn argued that requiring sellers to keep private records or store them with gun dealers would place too much of a burden on their Second Amendment rights.
Schumer showed little interest in dropping the record-keeping requirement when asked about it last week, and gun control advocates say expanding background checks would be meaningless in the absence of record-keeping.
A bill crafted by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) aimed at cracking down on illegal trafficking of firearms has the best chance of winning at least a handful of Republican votes on the floor.
Sens. Kirk, Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Chuck Grassley (Iowa), the ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee, have endorsed the gun trafficking legislation.
Gun control advocates said they were not surprised by Reid’s decision on the assault weapons ban.
“I think all of us knew all along that the gun violence bill would be the toughest lift,” said Ladd Everitt, spokesman for the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence. “I’m a little bit surprised on background checks. I don’t see why we couldn’t get to 60 votes on that.”
Mark Glaze, director of Mayors Against Illegal Guns, said he’s optimistic about the background checks legislation.
“The assault weapons ban was always going to be the hardest piece of this package,” he added. “If keeping it out of the base bill is the NRA’s primary achievement in 2013, I wouldn’t be surprised. I’d be happy.”
Public polls show strong support for expanded background checks. A national Quinnipiac University poll from earlier this month showed 88 percent of voters supported background checks for all gun buyers.
Reid told Feinstein that he would give her a vote on the assault weapons ban, which includes curbs on high-capacity clips, and a second vote on a stand-alone amendment to ban high-capacity bullet magazines.
White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough on Tuesday suggested that Obama will continue to push for a federal assault weapons ban. During an interview on CNN’s “The Lead,” McDonough said, “So we’re going to work on this, we’re going to find the votes.”
Feinstein acknowledged to reporters Tuesday that the renewal of the assault weapons ban, which expired in 2004, would not pass the upper chamber.
“I very much regret it,” Feinstein said of Reid’s decision to leave her legislation out of the base bill. “I tried my best.”
Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), who has been a vocal ally of Feinstein’s in calling for the ban on high-capacity magazines, said he was “very disappointed” and took to Twitter on Tuesday to express his frustration.
“It was wrong to let #AssaultWeaponsBan expire in ‘04 & it’s wrong to sweep it under rug now,” he tweeted. “Military-style weapons don’t belong on streets.”
In an email to The Hill, Chris Cox, the NRA’s executive director for legislative action, sought to keep pressure on Congress.
“Congress should reject this so-called ‘assault weapons ban’ whether it is offered as a standalone bill or as an amendment,” he said.
Thank you The Hill’s Blog Briefing Room | @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook
We’ve already organized hundreds of constituent groups putting high-profile pressure on members of Congress in their home districts and states, run ads featuring anti-NRA gun owners, and poured calls into Congress—but it hasn’t been enough. If we can raise $175,000 today, here’s what we’ll be able to do right away:
- Run aggressive TV Ads taking on senators from both parties who take money from the NRA and then vote against sensible gun violence prevention
- Ramp up the pressure in home districts and states—with events, petitions, and letters to the editor demanding an explanation from members of Congress of how they intend to vote on measures that could save the lives of their constituents
- Support powerful state and local anti-gun-violence campaigns, like that of a MoveOn Community Committee Against Gun Violence in Tucson, AZ, which organized and won a ban on gun shows in Tucson that don’t guarantee background checks for all sales.5 They’re ready to take this demand statewide, and other communities are ready to follow their lead.
We’ve seen congressional Democrats try to back down from a fight before—only to have the grassroots inject a dose of backbone and show them how it’s done on the state and local level.
MoveOn leaders are running campaigns in places where opponents to reform—Republicans and Democrats—think gun laws are untouchable. We’re actually winning on the state and local level. In addition to Tucson, Colorado just enacted significant background check reforms.6 We need to push those victories to other states, and use them to push leaders in Washington to turn the tide.
Thanks for all you do.
But it’s not enough. Contact your Senators your Congressmen and your local state level elected politicians and as them to please stop this NRAsshole led madness NOW.
Please do it today.
Sources:
1. “Reid guts Senate gun control bill,” The Hill, March 19, 2013
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=288260&id=64571-19935541-dJdW6Zx&t=4
2. Ibid.
3. “AP News in Brief at 10:58 P.M. EST,” The Washington Post, March 19, 2013
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=288261&id=64571-19935541-dJdW6Zx&t=5
4. “Obama’s Gun Reform Package Loses One Major Provision, Another In Danger,” Huffington Post, March 19, 2013
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=288262&id=64571-19935541-dJdW6Zx&t=6
5. “Tucson bans TCC gun shows without background checks,” KGUN9, February 5, 2013
http://www.kgun9.com/news/local/189947891.html
6. “Colorado Gov. Hickenlooper signs landmark gun bills,” The Denver Post, March 20, 2013
http://www.moveon.org/r?r=288264&id=64571-19935541-dJdW6Zx&t=7
Want to support our work? MoveOn Civic Action is entirely funded by our 7 million members—no corporate contributions, no big checks from CEOs. And our tiny staff ensures that small contributions go a long way. Chip in here.
How Many People Have Been Killed by Guns Since Newtown?
The answer to the simple question in that headline is 2,793 human lives have been erased bu gin violence in the 96 days since December 14th, 2012.
Thats Two Thousand, Seven Hundred & Ninety Three Americans lives lost. In Ninety Six days.
This “controlled by The NRAsshole Manipulated Congress”, MUST GO IN 2014.
In January, a little more than a month after Adam Lanza killed 26 people at Sandy Hook Elementary School with an AR-15-style semi-automatic rifle, Sen. Dianne Feinstein introduced the Assault Weapons Ban of 2013—an updated and more stringent version of the 1994 Federal Assault Weapons Ban. The bill would have made it a crime to sell, transfer, import, or manufacture AR-15-style rifles and other so-called semi-automatic assault weapons.
Not unexpectedly, the bill was polarizing, and conservative legislators were expected to block any gun control package that included the ban. Earlier this week, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid acknowledged the inevitable and told Feinstein that the new assault weapons ban wouldn’t be included in the main Senate gun control bill. Feinstein was disappointed; others were outraged.
We The People are 315 million strong, minus 4 million NRAsshole members. We The People have the political AND financial power to end the NRAssholes reign of terror over American lives.
Filed under: Bad News, Bullying, Business, Cartoons, Causes, Congress, Court Room/Legal, Crime, Democrats/Democratic, Disaster, Dumb Shit, Event, GOPukes/RepubliCANTS, Gun Control, Gun Violence, News, NRA, Photographs, Politics, POTUS Obama, Race, Racism, Stories, The White House, Thoughts Opinions & Ideas, Trayvon Martin George Zimmerman, Women's Causes, World News Tagged: | Assault Weapons Ban Defeated By Senate Democrats, Barack Obama, Democrat, Dianne Feinstein, Federal Assault Weapons Ban, Gun control, Harry Reid, National Rifle Association, Party leaders of the United States Senate, Reid, Senate, Tom Coburn
Jueseppi B.
[...] Chickenshit Senate Democrats Led By Leader Harry Reid Do It Again: WE Deserve A VOTE! (theobamacrat.com) [...]
[...] Chickenshit Senate Democrats Led By Leader Harry Reid Do It Again: WE Deserve A VOTE! (theobamacrat.com) [...]
Thank you for the pingback
[...] Chickenshit Senate Democrats Led By Leader Harry Reid Do It Again: WE Deserve A VOTE! (theobamacrat.com) [...]
[...] Chickenshit Senate Democrats Led By Leader Harry Reid Do It Again: WE Deserve A VOTE! (theobamacrat.com) [...]
Did you know that since January 1, 2013 roughly 2,505 people have been murdered by a gun. Sounds like a massive number doesn’t it? Did you since 2013 approximately 76,285 people have died from tobacco, 66,913 from Obesity, 42,502 from Medical Errors, 21578 from Hospital Associated Infection, 21,796 from Alcohol, 13,399 from the Influenza Virus, 87,369 from Drunk Driving, 6,922 Unintentional Poisoning, 5,450 All Drug Abuse, and 3,270 from Prescription Drug Overdose. Now realistically what makes more sense for us to fix? What is more logical? In 2011 according to the FBI 8,583 people were murdered by a firearm. Out of those 8,583 people 323 of them were killed by a rifle. I’ll include the links below where I found this information. I decided to stop listening to everyone else, and do my own research to determine where I stand on the matter at hand. I believe guns should not be banned. Banning guns even if it is just Assault Rifles, realistically will have no impact other than punishing the whole country. I don’t believe in mass punishment. I believe our efforts should be focused else where, rather than attempt to remove an entire industry from our economy and hand it over to the criminals of our society. Just food for thought and I meant no disrespect to anyone who disagrees with me. Just thought I would share some facts that I stumbled across. I also believe that when people hate it’s usually because in reality they do not know much about what it is they hate. This lack of knowledge or misguided knowledge obtained, causes fear which results in hatred.
http://www.romans322.com/daily-death-rate-statistics.php
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-8
U and your comments are as asinine as your information. I hate guns and will continue to work strongly to see them banned and all dumbasses such as yourself unarmed. I am ex military and have seen what a weapon can do to a human body, especially an assault weapon. When your dumbass comes up with a legitimate reason for anyone NOT in a war zone, to have an assault weapon in their home…..then get back to me here. Until then, “GSADF.” Have a beautiful life.
Well that is your choice hero. I too have seen the cruel and overwhelming images of a battlefield being an ex-infantryman myself. What people keep in their homes for protection is their business and their right…it’s what is on the streets that concerns me. Until your dumbass comes up with a way to get them off of the streets, then people just like me will continue to keep them safely tucked away in their homes.
Just as I suspected. You didn’t & can’t answer that one simple question….and that is why your comments will no longer be accepted here. When you can answer the question, douchebag, why or to what purpose anyone needs an assault weapon in their home….then your comment privileged will be restored. Until then….”GSADF.”
One more thing idiot, learn, educate yourself what rights Americans have under the 2nd amendment before you bring your dumbass to this blog spouting off asinine bullshit about rights. You are truly a dumbfuck. Ciao Bella.
Sorry for such a late reply. School has been hectic lately. Did you hear about the 3D printing of Assault Weapon receivers? Now that is ridiculous!
To answer your question I would first like to say that I am aware of our rights associated with the 2nd Amendment. I am aware that assault weapons are not covered. Yes I get that, but if it is legal for someone to own and keep an assault weapon in their home then it is their own business if they choose to do so. Whatever they legally pursue in which makes them happy is their right and none of my business. I believe someone should keep an assault weapon safely stored in their home incase we’re called to defend the constitution against all enemy’s foreign and domestic. Majority of our citizens have not had the privlage to fight for their freedom. The majority of us inherited it. Over the years we have given our government way to much power than they were meant to have. Do I need to go into detail? They invade other countries without our concent, they detain/torture us with no probable cause, they kill our citizens without the due process of law, dictate who we can and can’t legally marry, secretly invade our privacy, and pay news networks to fix our news. That is just a few things our government believes they are entitled to do as they please.
Common people, with their privately owned common weapons, formed an army, fought tyranny, and won our Independence. What’s wrong with our common people attempting to keep up with technology incase one day they must have to do the same?
It’s just another one of those “what ifs” but the chances of are government falling apart due to our financial situation seems to be a hell of alot more likely to happen than an invasion or even a typical home intrusion.
Even if they did ban assault weapons in America and confiscated them what do you think our government will do with them being that they are the number 1 arms dealer in the world?
My concern is not with what the Government does with banned confiscated weapons. My concern is what you, and other Americans HAVE done with assault weapons. Stay focused on the issue….. How Many People Have Been Killed by Guns Since Newtown? Answer is 3.129 human lives lost since December 14th, 2012. Thats in 106 days. An average of 30 a day.
Enjoy your Easter.
Harry Reid is an ass kisser and a piss poor leader.Some of the Democrats are the same.A bunch of spineless hippocritts who are disgusting.Pardon my obscene language.
Your obscene language is well understood. I feel that exact way about the Democratic party.
I am so beyond pissed with this lack of backbone and Dumb Ass Congress and all the kissing up to the NRAsses when We The People out number then and are speaking up loud and clear…yet still we are not getting shit done!!! This is killing me!
Yeah….no words come to mind over this betrayal bu Democrats.